On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
Hi, Julien.
>
> First of all, thank you Oleksandr for starting a thread around CPUFreq
> support.
Thank you for the valued comments.
>
> On 11/16/2017 05:04 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>
>> On 16/11/17 14:57, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Andre Przywara
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andre
>
>
>
>>> So Xen does not need to throw in its own ideas here. Which would avoid
>>> some of the hard problems we encountered.
>> I got all your point.
>> Just question. Why does existing CPUFreq on x86 have own logic? Do
Hi,
>> So Xen does not need to throw in its own ideas here. Which would avoid
>> some of the hard problems we encountered.
> I got all your point.
> Just question. Why does existing CPUFreq on x86 have own logic? Do we have
> something yet another on ARM that having own logic in Xen doesn't
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Andre Przywara
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andre
Thank you for your comments!
>
> On 16/11/17 14:57, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Andre Przywara
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>> Hi Andre, Jassi
>>
>> Thank you for your comments!
>>
>>>
>>> On 14/11/17
Hi,
First of all, thank you Oleksandr for starting a thread around CPUFreq
support.
On 11/16/2017 05:04 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
On 16/11/17 14:57, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Andre Przywara
wrote:
Anyway, I think we should go step-by-step.
If community agr
Hi,
On 16/11/17 14:57, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Andre Przywara
> wrote:
>> Hi,
> Hi Andre, Jassi
>
> Thank you for your comments!
>
>>
>> On 14/11/17 20:46, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Andre Przywara
>>> wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Andre Przywara
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andre, Jassi
Thank you for your comments!
>
> On 14/11/17 20:46, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Andre Przywara
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>> Hi Andre
>>
>>>
>>> On 13/11/17 19:40, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote
On 15 November 2017 at 18:58, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/11/17 03:03, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On 15 November 2017 at 02:16, Oleksandr Tyshchenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Andre Przywara
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> 3. Direct ported SCPI protocol, mailbox infrastructur
Hi,
On 14/11/17 20:46, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Andre Przywara
> wrote:
>> Hi,
> Hi Andre
>
>>
>> On 13/11/17 19:40, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Andre Przywara
>>> wrote:
Hi,
>>> Hi Andre,
>>>
thanks very
Hi,
On 15/11/17 03:03, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 15 November 2017 at 02:16, Oleksandr Tyshchenko
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Andre Przywara
>> wrote:
>>
>
>> 3. Direct ported SCPI protocol, mailbox infrastructure and the ARM SMC
>> triggered mailbox driver. All componen
On 15 November 2017 at 02:16, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Andre Przywara
> wrote:
>
> 3. Direct ported SCPI protocol, mailbox infrastructure and the ARM SMC
> triggered mailbox driver. All components except mailbox driver are in
> mainline Linux.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Andre Przywara
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andre
>
> On 13/11/17 19:40, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Andre Przywara
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>>>
>>> thanks very much for your work on this!
>> Thank you for your comments.
>>
>>>
>>
Hi,
On 13/11/17 19:40, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Andre Przywara
> wrote:
>> Hi,
> Hi Andre
>
>>
>> thanks very much for your work on this!
> Thank you for your comments.
>
>>
>> On 09/11/17 17:09, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Andre Przywara
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andre
>
> thanks very much for your work on this!
Thank you for your comments.
>
> On 09/11/17 17:09, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
>>
>> Hi, all.
>>
>> The purpose of this RFC patch series is to add CPU
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Andrii Anisov wrote:
> Dear Oleksandr,
Dear Andrii
>
>
> Please consider my `Reviewed-by: Andrii Anisov ` for
> all patches.
>
> What you missed after extracting this stuff from github.
Thanks. I will add.
>
>
> On 09.11.17 19:09, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>
>>
Hi,
thanks very much for your work on this!
On 09/11/17 17:09, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
>
> Hi, all.
>
> The purpose of this RFC patch series is to add CPUFreq support to Xen on ARM.
> Motivation of hypervisor based CPUFreq is to enable one of the main PM
> use
Dear Oleksandr,
Please consider my `Reviewed-by: Andrii Anisov `
for all patches.
What you missed after extracting this stuff from github.
On 09.11.17 19:09, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
--
*Andrii Anisov*
___
Xen
17 matches
Mail list logo
