Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1] x86: only check for one watchdog NMI

2015-06-23 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 23.06.15 at 11:34, wrote: > On 23/06/15 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 22.06.15 at 18:21, wrote: >>> Since the NMI handler can now recognize watchdog NMIs, make >>> check_nmi_watchdog() only check for at least one watchdog NMI. This >>> prevents false negatives caused by other process

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1] x86: only check for one watchdog NMI

2015-06-23 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 23/06/15 10:09, Jan Beulich wrote: On 22.06.15 at 18:21, wrote: >> Since the NMI handler can now recognize watchdog NMIs, make >> check_nmi_watchdog() only check for at least one watchdog NMI. This >> prevents false negatives caused by other processors (which may be >> being power managed

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1] x86: only check for one watchdog NMI

2015-06-23 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 22.06.15 at 18:21, wrote: > Since the NMI handler can now recognize watchdog NMIs, make > check_nmi_watchdog() only check for at least one watchdog NMI. This > prevents false negatives caused by other processors (which may be > being power managed by the BIOS) running at reduced clock freq