Hi,
On 22/05/17 23:15, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On 11/05/17 18:53, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> The target CPU for an LPI is encoded in the interrupt translation table
>>> entry, so can't be easily derived from just an LPI number (short o
On Tue, 16 May 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 11/05/17 18:53, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > The target CPU for an LPI is encoded in the interrupt translation table
> > entry, so can't be easily derived from just an LPI number (short of
> > walking *all* tables and find the matching LPI).
Hi Andre,
On 11/05/17 18:53, Andre Przywara wrote:
The target CPU for an LPI is encoded in the interrupt translation table
entry, so can't be easily derived from just an LPI number (short of
walking *all* tables and find the matching LPI).
To avoid this in case we need to know the VCPU (for the