On Fri, 2015-04-10 at 18:16 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Save the x86 HVM specific parts of the domain. This is considerably simpler
> than an x86 PV domain. Only the HVM_CONTEXT and HVM_PARAMS records are
> needed.
>
> There is no need for any page normalisation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Coo
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 14:21 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> +static int write_hvm_params(struct xc_sr_context *ctx)
> >> +{
> >> +static const unsigned int params[] = {
[...]
> > While reviewing my 'soft reset' series Ian C raised a question about the
> > unsafeness of sequential get/set of HV
On 13/04/15 13:28, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes:
>
>> +/*
>> + * Query for a range of HVM parameters and write an HVM_PARAMS record into
>> the
>> + * stream.
>> + */
>> +static int write_hvm_params(struct xc_sr_context *ctx)
>> +{
>> +static const unsigned int params[] = {
Andrew Cooper writes:
> Save the x86 HVM specific parts of the domain. This is considerably simpler
> than an x86 PV domain. Only the HVM_CONTEXT and HVM_PARAMS records are
> needed.
>
> There is no need for any page normalisation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
> CC: Ian Campbell
> CC: Ian
