On 2016/3/17 19:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.03.16 at 12:03, wrote:
>> > On 2016/3/17 18:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > On 17.03.16 at 10:41, wrote:
> >>> > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
> >>> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
> >>> > @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
> >>> >
On 2016/3/17 18:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.03.16 at 10:41, wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
>> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
>> > @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
>> >
>> > #define CONFIG_ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 7 /* XXX */
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> > +#define CONFIG_ACPI_BO
>>> On 17.03.16 at 10:41, wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
>
> #define CONFIG_ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 7 /* XXX */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +#define CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT 1
> +#endif
Do we think that ACPI without ACPI_BOOT is useful
>>> On 17.03.16 at 12:03, wrote:
> On 2016/3/17 18:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.03.16 at 10:41, wrote:
>>> > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
>>> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
>>> > @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
>>> >
>>> > #define CONFIG_ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 7 /* XXX */
>>> >
>>> > +#ifde
>>> On 17.03.16 at 14:10, wrote:
>
> On 2016/3/17 19:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.03.16 at 12:03, wrote:
>>> > On 2016/3/17 18:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> > On 17.03.16 at 10:41, wrote:
>> >>> > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h
>> >>> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/config.h