> On February 18, 2016 5:21pm, wrote:
> >>> On 18.02.16 at 09:47, wrote:
> >> On February 18, 2016 4:36pm, wrote:
> >> >>> On 18.02.16 at 08:36, wrote:
> >> >> On February 17, 2016 10:41pm, wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 05.02.16 at 11:18, wrote:
> >> >> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.
>>> On 18.02.16 at 09:47, wrote:
>> On February 18, 2016 4:36pm, wrote:
>> >>> On 18.02.16 at 08:36, wrote:
>> >> On February 17, 2016 10:41pm, wrote:
>> >> >>> On 05.02.16 at 11:18, wrote:
>> >> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
>> >> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> On February 18, 2016 4:36pm, wrote:
> >>> On 18.02.16 at 08:36, wrote:
> >> On February 17, 2016 10:41pm, wrote:
> >> >>> On 05.02.16 at 11:18, wrote:
> >> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> >> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> >> > +if ( pci_hide_device(
>>> On 18.02.16 at 08:36, wrote:
>> On February 17, 2016 10:41pm, wrote:
>> >>> On 05.02.16 at 11:18, wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
>> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
>> > +if ( pci_hide_device(bus, devfn) )
>>
>> But now I'm _really_ puzzled:
> On February 17, 2016 10:41pm, wrote:
> >>> On 05.02.16 at 11:18, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> > +if ( pci_hide_device(bus, devfn) )
>
> But now I'm _really_ puzzled: You acquire the exact lock that
> pci_hide
>>> On 05.02.16 at 11:18, wrote:
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,69 @@ int qinval_device_iotlb(struct iommu *iommu,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void dev_invalidate_iotlb_timeout(struct iommu *iommu, u16 did,
> +
