On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:58:14AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 01.09.16 at 23:19, wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:46:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 31.08.16 at 22:50, wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 31.08.16 at 16:
>>> On 01.09.16 at 23:19, wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:46:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 31.08.16 at 22:50, wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 31.08.16 at 16:59, wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beuli
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:46:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 31.08.16 at 22:50, wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 31.08.16 at 16:59, wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 20.08.16 at 00:
>>> On 31.08.16 at 22:50, wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 31.08.16 at 16:59, wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 20.08.16 at 00:43, wrote:
>> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S
>> >> > +++ b/xen/ar
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 31.08.16 at 16:59, wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 20.08.16 at 00:43, wrote:
[...]
> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S
> >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S
> >> > @@ -12,
>>> On 31.08.16 at 16:59, wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 20.08.16 at 00:43, wrote:
>> > Every multiboot protocol (regardless of version) compatible image must
>> > specify its load address (in ELF or multiboot header). Multiboot protocol
>> > compa
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.08.16 at 00:43, wrote:
> > Every multiboot protocol (regardless of version) compatible image must
> > specify its load address (in ELF or multiboot header). Multiboot protocol
> > compatible loader have to load image at speci
>>> On 20.08.16 at 00:43, wrote:
> Every multiboot protocol (regardless of version) compatible image must
> specify its load address (in ELF or multiboot header). Multiboot protocol
> compatible loader have to load image at specified address. However, there
> is no guarantee that the requested mem