>>> On 19.12.16 at 15:48, wrote:
> On 12/19/2016 09:17 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.12.16 at 00:18, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
>>> @@ -1425,6 +1425,15 @@ long arch_do_domctl(
>>> }
>>> break;
>>>
>>> +case XEN_DOMCTL_acpi_a
On 12/19/2016 09:17 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.16 at 00:18, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
>> @@ -1425,6 +1425,15 @@ long arch_do_domctl(
>> }
>> break;
>>
>> +case XEN_DOMCTL_acpi_access:
>> +if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) )
>>> On 17.12.16 at 00:18, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> @@ -1425,6 +1425,15 @@ long arch_do_domctl(
> }
> break;
>
> +case XEN_DOMCTL_acpi_access:
> +if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) )
> +ret = -EINVAL;
I think it would be b