> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.w...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 12:33 AM
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:06:40PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > We need to make sure that last_vcpu is not pointing to VCPU whose
> > VPMU is being destroyed. Otherwise we may try to d
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:06:40PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> We need to make sure that last_vcpu is not pointing to VCPU whose
> VPMU is being destroyed. Otherwise we may try to dereference it in
> the future, when VCPU is gone.
>
> We have to do this via IPI since otherwise there is a (some
>>> On 18.12.14 at 19:06, wrote:
> We need to make sure that last_vcpu is not pointing to VCPU whose
> VPMU is being destroyed. Otherwise we may try to dereference it in
> the future, when VCPU is gone.
>
> We have to do this via IPI since otherwise there is a (somewheat
> theoretical) chance tha
