Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3.1 15/15] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-11-30 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 30.11.16 at 15:23, wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 07:09:47AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 30.11.16 at 13:40, wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:15:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> >>> On 29.10.16 at 11:00, wrote: >> >> > Also, regions marked as E820_ACPI or E820_NVS are i

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3.1 15/15] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-11-30 Thread Roger Pau Monne
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 07:09:47AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 30.11.16 at 13:40, wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:15:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 29.10.16 at 11:00, wrote: > >> > Also, regions marked as E820_ACPI or E820_NVS are identity mapped into > >> > Dom0 > >> >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3.1 15/15] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-11-30 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 30.11.16 at 13:40, wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:15:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 29.10.16 at 11:00, wrote: >> > Also, regions marked as E820_ACPI or E820_NVS are identity mapped into Dom0 >> > p2m, plus any top-level ACPI tables that should be accessible to Dom0 and >> >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3.1 15/15] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-11-30 Thread Roger Pau Monne
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:15:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 29.10.16 at 11:00, wrote: > > Also, regions marked as E820_ACPI or E820_NVS are identity mapped into Dom0 > > p2m, plus any top-level ACPI tables that should be accessible to Dom0 and > > that don't reside in RAM regions. This i

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3.1 15/15] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables

2016-11-14 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 29.10.16 at 11:00, wrote: > Also, regions marked as E820_ACPI or E820_NVS are identity mapped into Dom0 > p2m, plus any top-level ACPI tables that should be accessible to Dom0 and > that don't reside in RAM regions. This is needed because some memory maps > don't properly account for all th