Hi Ian,
On 3 November 2015 at 23:22, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 22:57 +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> After discussing with Ian Campbell, Since we already can load all
>> the necessary binaries for Xen boot on arm64 for now, we don't really
>> need "xen_module" comm
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 22:57 +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> After discussing with Ian Campbell, Since we already can load all
> the necessary binaries for Xen boot on arm64 for now, we don't really
> need "xen_module" command now.
> But maybe someday , xen need a new type of binary in b
Hi Vladimir,
After discussing with Ian Campbell, Since we already can load all
the necessary binaries for Xen boot on arm64 for now, we don't really
need "xen_module" command now.
But maybe someday , xen need a new type of binary in boot time, then
we still need this support.
So I will submit
Hi Vladimir,
yes, Thanks for your modification :-)
I just follow the xen boot protocol :
http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions/Multiboot
xen_module is just for "--type" option, I will discuss this with Xen
developer for this.
If we need this option, I will resubmit it
Committed without the xen_module command. Its argument parsing was
non-trivial and I don't quite get what its intent is. Can you resubmit?
On 23.07.2015 07:16, fu@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Fu Wei
>
> grub-core/loader/arm64/xen_boot.c
>
> - This adds support for the Xen boot on ARM specific
