On 24/02/16 16:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> . snip..
>> There is a neater way of doing this, which doesn't involve having "if (
>> regular ) else if ( xsplice )" logic chains through the code.
> s/chains/chain/
>
> There is only one that uses the 'xsplice' name in it:-)
>
> The other two are
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:35:32PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 12/02/16 18:05, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > diff --git a/xen/common/symbols.c b/xen/common/symbols.c
> > index a59c59d..bf5623f 100644
> > --- a/xen/common/symbols.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/symbols.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #i
. snip..
> There is a neater way of doing this, which doesn't involve having "if (
> regular ) else if ( xsplice )" logic chains through the code.
s/chains/chain/
There is only one that uses the 'xsplice' name in it:-)
The other two are wrapped with the 'is_patch'.
>
> Given a
>
> struct virtu
On 12/02/16 18:05, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> diff --git a/xen/common/symbols.c b/xen/common/symbols.c
> index a59c59d..bf5623f 100644
> --- a/xen/common/symbols.c
> +++ b/xen/common/symbols.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#include
> #include
> #include
>
