On May 04, 2016 9:52 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.05.16 at 14:09, wrote:
> > On May 04, 2016 9:26 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> > From: Xu, Quan
> >> > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 5:25 PM static void
> >> > intel_iommu_iotlb_flush(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn,
> >> > unsigned int
>
>>> On 04.05.16 at 14:09, wrote:
> On May 04, 2016 9:26 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> > From: Xu, Quan
>> > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 5:25 PM
>> > static void intel_iommu_iotlb_flush(struct domain *d, unsigned long
>> > gfn, unsigned int
>> > page_count)
>>
>> could we remove "Intel_" prefix com
On May 04, 2016 9:26 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Xu, Quan
> > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 5:25 PM
> >
> > The propagation value from IOMMU flush interfaces may be positive,
> > which indicates callers need to flush cache, not one of faliures.
> >
> > when the propagation value is positive, t
> From: Xu, Quan
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 5:25 PM
>
> The propagation value from IOMMU flush interfaces may be positive, which
> indicates callers need to flush cache, not one of faliures.
>
> when the propagation value is positive, this patch fixes this flush issue
> as follows:
> - call
