On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:02:13AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 10:46 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> On 03/29/2016 10:19 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 12:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> >
>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 10:46 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 03/29/2016 10:19 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 12:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > > > I'd appreciate if someone can test this patch-set on Xen to verify
>>
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 10:46 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 03/29/2016 10:19 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 12:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > > I'd appreciate if someone can test this patch-set on Xen to verify
> > > > that there is no change in "x86/PAT: Configuration
On 03/29/2016 10:19 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 12:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
I'd appreciate if someone can test this patch-set on Xen to verify that
there is no change in "x86/PAT: Configuration [0-7] .." message in
dmesg.
So I don't have a Xen setup, but hopefully such test
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 12:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Toshi Kani wrote:
>
> > A Xorg failure on qemu32 was reported as a regression [1] caused by
> > 'commit 9cd25aac1f44 ("x86/mm/pat: Emulate PAT when it is disabled")'.
> > This patch-set fixes the regression.
> >
> > Negative effects of th
* Toshi Kani wrote:
> A Xorg failure on qemu32 was reported as a regression [1] caused by
> 'commit 9cd25aac1f44 ("x86/mm/pat: Emulate PAT when it is disabled")'.
> This patch-set fixes the regression.
>
> Negative effects of this regression were two failures [2] in Xorg on
> QEMU with QEMU CPU
