On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 09:02 +, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 17/12/16 01:46, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 00:53 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar
> > > Acked-by: Dario Faggioli
> > >
> > Better than before. But still, if I:
> > - save this mail as
On 17/12/16 01:46, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 00:53 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
>> The patch gets rid of a redundant check in csched_vcpu_acct. In fact,
>> the function is only called from csched_tick, which already checks
>> that current is not the idle vcpu. The patch also adds
On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 14:34 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi Dario,
>
> I tried with 'git am' to apply the patch after downloading the mbox
> file, that worked fine. Do let me know if that is ok.
>
Well, if you tried and it works, I'm sure it is. I don't really use
`git am` as part of my workload
Hi Dario,
I tried with 'git am' to apply the patch after downloading the mbox file,
that worked fine. Do let me know if that is ok.
Regards,
~Praveen.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Praveen Kumar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Dario Faggioli > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2016-12
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Dario Faggioli
wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 00:53 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> > The patch gets rid of a redundant check in csched_vcpu_acct. In fact,
> > the function is only called from csched_tick, which already checks
> > that current is not the idle v
On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 00:53 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> The patch gets rid of a redundant check in csched_vcpu_acct. In fact,
> the function is only called from csched_tick, which already checks
> that current is not the idle vcpu. The patch also adds an ASSERT to
> the same effect, in order to m
