On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 16:36 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 15:26 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 12:25 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > -=item B
> > > -=item B
> > > -=item B
> > > -=item B
> >
> > Do these removals imply there are some redundant fields
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 15:26 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 12:25 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > -=item B
> > -=item B
> > -=item B
> > -=item B
>
> Do these removals imply there are some redundant fields in
> libxl_domain_sched_params now?
>
Yes, indeed.
> If so
> shall we
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 12:25 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> -=item B
> -=item B
> -=item B
> -=item B
Do these removals imply there are some redundant fields in
libxl_domain_sched_params now? If so
shall we tag them with a comment or something? (We could do IDL code to
ifdef them for older LIBXL_A
