On 17/02/16 07:40, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> +if ((rdmsr_amd_safe(msr, &lo, &hi) == 0) &&
>> +(wrmsr_amd_safe(msr, lo, hi) == 0))
>> +levelling_caps |= caps;
>> +
>> +*msr_val = ((uint64_t)hi << 32) | lo;
>> +}
> Why can't this function, currently returning void, simply re
>>> On 05.02.16 at 14:42, wrote:
> @@ -126,126 +133,189 @@ static const struct cpuidmask *__init noinline
> get_cpuidmask(const char *opt)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Sets caps in expected_levelling_cap, probes for the specified mask MSR,
> and
> + * set caps in levelling_caps if it is found. Processo
