On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 06:40:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 26.08.15 at 14:33, wrote:
> > Do you suggest that I should put this functionality (PE with multiboot
> > headers) on top of this patch series? Well, it is possible but this
> > series is big and I would like to avoid to make it
>>> On 26.08.15 at 14:33, wrote:
> Do you suggest that I should put this functionality (PE with multiboot
> headers) on top of this patch series? Well, it is possible but this
> series is big and I would like to avoid to make it bigger. I prefer to
> get current patches into Xen tree and then work
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:46:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.08.15 at 18:31, wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 06:09:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 24.08.15 at 22:54, wrote:
[...]
> >> And you realize that we use a "special method" for building the
> >> current "flat" E
>>> On 25.08.15 at 18:31, wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 06:09:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 24.08.15 at 22:54, wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:35:21AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 22.08.15 at 15:59, wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:39:39AM -0600, Jan Beuli
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 06:09:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 24.08.15 at 22:54, wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:35:21AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 22.08.15 at 15:59, wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:39:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/08/15 21:54, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> >
> > Currently, PE file contains many sections which are not "linear" (one
> > after another without any holes) or even do not have representation
> > in a file (e.g. BSS). In theo
>>> On 24.08.15 at 22:54, wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:35:21AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 22.08.15 at 15:59, wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:39:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote:
>> >> > Currently, PE file contains many sections which are
On 24/08/15 21:54, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> Currently, PE file contains many sections which are not "linear" (one
> after another without any holes) or even do not have representation
> in a file (e.g. BSS). In theory there is a chance that we could build
> proper PE file using curre
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:35:21AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 22.08.15 at 15:59, wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:39:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote:
> >> > Build xen.gz with EFI code. We need this to support multiboot2
> >> > protocol on EFI platf
>>> On 22.08.15 at 15:59, wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:39:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote:
>> > Build xen.gz with EFI code. We need this to support multiboot2
>> > protocol on EFI platforms.
>> >
>> > If we wish to load not ELF file using multiboot (v1) or
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:39:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote:
> > Build xen.gz with EFI code. We need this to support multiboot2
> > protocol on EFI platforms.
> >
> > If we wish to load not ELF file using multiboot (v1) or multiboot2 then
>
> DYM "a non-ELF file"
>>> On 20.07.15 at 16:29, wrote:
> Build xen.gz with EFI code. We need this to support multiboot2
> protocol on EFI platforms.
>
> If we wish to load not ELF file using multiboot (v1) or multiboot2 then
DYM "a non-ELF file"?
> it must contain "linear" (or "flat") representation of code and data
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:29:05PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Build xen.gz with EFI code. We need this to support multiboot2
> protocol on EFI platforms.
>
> If we wish to load not ELF file using multiboot (v1) or multiboot2 then
> it must contain "linear" (or "flat") representation of code and
13 matches
Mail list logo
