Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread David Vrabel
On 24/06/16 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote: > > And then - what's your expectation? Any parts of this new > interface can subsequently be marked stable if we so wish. I > don't see why this needs to happen right away. Ok. David ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xe

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread George Dunlap
On 24/06/16 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.06.16 at 15:51, wrote: >> On 24/06/16 14:37, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 24.06.16 at 15:27, wrote: On 24/06/16 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: >> On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> A long while

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.06.16 at 15:51, wrote: > On 24/06/16 14:37, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.06.16 at 15:27, wrote: >>> On 24/06/16 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: > On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >> A long while back separating out all control kind operatio

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread David Vrabel
On 24/06/16 14:37, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.06.16 at 15:27, wrote: >> On 24/06/16 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: > A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended > for use by only the co

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.06.16 at 15:27, wrote: > On 24/06/16 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: >>> On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended for use by only the control domain or device model) from the curre

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread David Vrabel
On 24/06/16 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: >> On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended >>> for use by only the control domain or device model) from the currect >>> hvmop hypercall has been discusse

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.06.16 at 12:29, wrote: > On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >> A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended >> for use by only the control domain or device model) from the currect >> hvmop hypercall has been discussed. This series aims at finally making >> th

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] hvmctl hypercall

2016-06-24 Thread David Vrabel
On 24/06/16 11:21, Jan Beulich wrote: > A long while back separating out all control kind operations (intended > for use by only the control domain or device model) from the currect > hvmop hypercall has been discussed. This series aims at finally making > this reality (at once allowing to streamli