Ross Lagerwall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/*] xen: xen-domid-restrict
improvements"):
> If no one objects, I propose adding the following calls to
> libxendevicemodel (with underlying Xen implementations, of course) that
> would be usable after the xendevicemo
;
Juergen Gross
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/*] xen: xen-domid-restrict
improvements
On 10/04/2017 05:18 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
(Resending this because 1. I got the CC for xen-devel wrong; 2. I got
the subject wrong: there are actually 8 patches; 3. I mangled
Anthony's name in thehe
Ross Lagerwall writes ("Re: [PATCH v2 0/*] xen: xen-domid-restrict
improvements"):
> On 10/04/2017 05:18 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > However, there are changes to qemu needed. In particular
> >
> > * The -xen-domid-restrict option does not work properly right now.
> > It only restricts a sm
Juergen Gross
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/*] xen: xen-domid-restrict
> improvements
>
> On 10/04/2017 05:18 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > (Resending this because 1. I got the CC for xen-devel wrong; 2. I got
> > the subject wrong: there are actually 8 patches; 3. I
On 10/04/2017 05:18 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
(Resending this because 1. I got the CC for xen-devel wrong; 2. I got
the subject wrong: there are actually 8 patches; 3. I mangled
Anthony's name in theheaders. Sorry for the noise.)
I have been working on trying to get qemu, when running as a Xen
dev
