>>> On 23.02.16 at 16:38, wrote:
> On 2/23/16 7:45 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 23/02/16 13:42, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 23/02/16 13:12, Doug Goldstein wrote:
This macro doesn't really provide a benefit. When support is added the
implementer can implement this how it needs to be and
On 2/23/16 7:45 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 23/02/16 13:42, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 23/02/16 13:12, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>> This macro doesn't really provide a benefit. When support is added the
>>> implementer can implement this how it needs to be and not conform to the
>>> macro. Additiona
On 23/02/16 13:42, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 23/02/16 13:12, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> This macro doesn't really provide a benefit. When support is added the
>> implementer can implement this how it needs to be and not conform to the
>> macro. Additionally this change limits the output of the warnin
On 23/02/16 13:12, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> This macro doesn't really provide a benefit. When support is added the
> implementer can implement this how it needs to be and not conform to the
> macro. Additionally this change limits the output of the warning to just
> once instead of nrpages worth. Wh
