On 17/10/17 13:58, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 01:56:18PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:36:44PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> Currently there are many offenders of the unaligned access checks,
>>> which makes booting with the unaligned check a PVH Dom0
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 01:58:47PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 01:56:18PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:36:44PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > > Currently there are many offenders of the unaligned access checks,
> > > which makes booting with th
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 01:56:18PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:36:44PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > Currently there are many offenders of the unaligned access checks,
> > which makes booting with the unaligned check a PVH Dom0 impossible.
> >
> > The main offenders seem
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:36:44PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Currently there are many offenders of the unaligned access checks,
> which makes booting with the unaligned check a PVH Dom0 impossible.
>
> The main offenders seem to be the ACPI code, the VMX code and
> specially the intremap cod
>>> On 17.10.17 at 13:36, wrote:
> --- a/xen/Rules.mk
> +++ b/xen/Rules.mk
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ $(filter-out %.init.o $(nogcov-y),$(obj-y) $(obj-bin-y)
> $(extra-y)): CFLAGS += -
> endif
>
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_UBSAN),y)
> -$(filter-out %.init.o $(noubsan-y),$(obj-y) $(obj-bin-y) $(extra-y)): CFL
