>>> On 26.06.15 at 11:49, wrote:
> Sorry, I don't follow - I did truncate the data if bytes_per_rep >
> curr->arch.vm_event.emul_read_data->size. But I'm passing reps on
> untouched to hvmemul_do_pio(). Did I misunderstand the hvmemul_do_pio()
> code? Should I pass a (*reps * bytes_per_rep) sized
On 06/26/2015 11:44 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -891,14 +934,37 @@ static int hvmemul_rep_outs(
>>>!!(ctxt->regs->eflags & X86_EFLAGS_DF),
>>> NULL);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int hvmemul_rep_movs(
>>> +static int hvmemul_rep_outs_set_con
>>> On 26.06.15 at 10:22, wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 06:57 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.06.15 at 11:03, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>>> @@ -578,6 +578,28 @@ static int hvmemul_read(
>>> container_of(ctxt, struct hvm_emulate_ctxt, ctx
On 06/25/2015 06:57 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.06.15 at 11:03, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> @@ -578,6 +578,28 @@ static int hvmemul_read(
>> container_of(ctxt, struct hvm_emulate_ctxt, ctxt));
>> }
>>
>> +static int hvmemul_re
>>> On 15.06.15 at 11:03, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> @@ -578,6 +578,28 @@ static int hvmemul_read(
> container_of(ctxt, struct hvm_emulate_ctxt, ctxt));
> }
>
> +static int hvmemul_read_set_context(
> +enum x86_segment seg,
> +
