On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:09 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/01/16 16:54, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 16:42 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > >
> > > > IIRC void * arithmetic is a gcc (and presumably clang) extension,
> > > > which
> > > > we
> > > > can specify for Xen itself,
On 05/01/16 16:54, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 16:42 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> IIRC void * arithmetic is a gcc (and presumably clang) extension, which
>>> we
>>> can specify for Xen itself, but I'm not sure about libxc (cf: recent
>>> discussions about building stuff for
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 16:42 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> > IIRC void * arithmetic is a gcc (and presumably clang) extension, which
> > we
> > can specify for Xen itself, but I'm not sure about libxc (cf: recent
> > discussions about building stuff for Windows).
>
> It isn't void* arithmetic.
On 05/01/16 16:03, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 21:24 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Some features depend on other features. Working out and maintaining the
>> exact
>> dependency tree is complicated, so it is expressed in script form instead.
>>
>> `gen-feature-deps.py` parses 'xe
On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 21:24 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Some features depend on other features. Working out and maintaining the exact
> dependency tree is complicated, so it is expressed in script form instead.
>
> `gen-feature-deps.py` parses 'xen/include/public/arch-x86/featureset.h' (To
> ob
