On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.11.14 at 16:31, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>
> Leaving aside the general reservation I just voiced in reply to 0/7, I
> wonder whether - considering that you mostly replace the code
> th
>>> On 12.11.14 at 16:31, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
Leaving aside the general reservation I just voiced in reply to 0/7, I
wonder whether - considering that you mostly replace the code
that gets changed in this file - it wouldn't be a nice opportunity to
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 12/11/14 15:31, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > diff --git a/xen/include/public/mem_event.h
> b/xen/include/public/mem_event.h
> > index 599f9e8..c0e9394 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/public/mem_event.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/public/mem_event.h
On 12/11/14 15:31, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> diff --git a/xen/include/public/mem_event.h b/xen/include/public/mem_event.h
> index 599f9e8..c0e9394 100644
> --- a/xen/include/public/mem_event.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/mem_event.h
> @@ -49,15 +49,19 @@
> #define MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE_NOWRITE (1 <