>>> On 26.09.16 at 19:12, wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:25:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 29.07.16 at 18:28, wrote:
>> > This is a very rough implementation of a PVHv2 Dom0. There are still a
>> > bunch
>> > of things that will not work properly (like SR-IOV, MSI, MSI-X...), but
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 07:12:39PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:25:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 29.07.16 at 18:28, wrote:
> > > This is a very rough implementation of a PVHv2 Dom0. There are still a
> > > bunch
> > >
> > > of things that will not work
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:25:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 29.07.16 at 18:28, wrote:
> > This is a very rough implementation of a PVHv2 Dom0. There are still a
> > bunch
> >
> > of things that will not work properly (like SR-IOV, MSI, MSI-X...), but it
> > *should* be able to boot a
>>> On 29.07.16 at 18:28, wrote:
> This is a very rough implementation of a PVHv2 Dom0. There are still a bunch
>
> of things that will not work properly (like SR-IOV, MSI, MSI-X...), but it
> *should* be able to boot a Dom0 kernel and it doesn't require using PIRQs.
It's been a long time sinc
Hello,
Sorry, I've failed to Cc both Konrad and Boris on this...
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 06:28:55PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a very rough implementation of a PVHv2 Dom0. There are still a bunch
> of things that will not work properly (like SR-IOV, MSI, MSI-X...), but i
