On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 03:06:29PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 15:30 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > htobe*() and be*toh() don't exist there. While replacing the 32-bit
> > ones with hton() and ntoh() would be possible, there wouldn't be an
> > obvious replacement for the 64-bi
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 15:30 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> htobe*() and be*toh() don't exist there. While replacing the 32-bit
> ones with hton() and ntoh() would be possible, there wouldn't be an
> obvious replacement for the 64-bit ones. Hence just take what current
> glibc (2.21) has (assuming __bs
