On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:50:13AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.09.17 at 13:31, wrote:
> > On 08/31/2017 01:46 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 31.08.17 at 12:27, wrote:
> >>> +### Live Patching
> >>> +
> >>> +Status: Supported, x86 only
> >>> +
> >>> +Compile time disabled
> >>
>
On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 15:16 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> > >
> > > +### Null Scheduler
> > > +
> > > +Status: Experimental
> > > +
> > >
> > Can we say more than Experimental? I think it should
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Rich Persaud wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:16, George Dunlap wrote:
>
> +### vTPM Support
>
> +
>
> + Status: Supported, x86 only
>
>
> This should probably be x86/vTPM. TPM, the way we are discussing
On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:16, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>>> +### vTPM Support
>>> +
>>> +Status: Supported, x86 only
>>
>> This should probably be x86/vTPM. TPM, the way we are discussing it, is
>> an x86-only implementation. ARM-based alternatives are not called TPM
>> AFAIK.
>
> Someone said th
On 11/09/17 17:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/09/17 22:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Direct-boot kernel image format
+
+Supported, x86: bzImage
+Supported, ARM32: zImage
+Supported, ARM64
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 07/09/17 22:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> > > +
> > > +Supported, x86: bzImage
> > > +Supported, ARM32: zImage
> > > +Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - N
On 09/11/2017 05:16 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 11/09/17 15:16, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Direct-boot kernel image format
+
+ Supported, x86: bzImage
+ Supported, ARM3
On 11/09/17 17:15, George Dunlap wrote:
On 09/11/2017 04:54 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I missed e-mail. It seems I was not CCed on it.
Sorry -- already had a pretty large CC list. I'll add you for the next one.
+### ARM/SMMU
+
+Status: Supported, with caveats
+
+Only ARM SMMU
On 11/09/17 15:16, George Dunlap wrote:
On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Direct-boot kernel image format
+
+Supported, x86: bzImage
+Supported, ARM32: zImage
+Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is correct
On 09/11/2017 04:54 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I missed e-mail. It seems I was not CCed on it.
Sorry -- already had a pretty large CC list. I'll add you for the next one.
+### ARM/SMMU
+
+ Status: Supported, with caveats
+
+Only ARM SMMU hardware is sup
On 09/11/2017 05:00 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 07/09/17 22:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
>>> +
>>> + Supported, x86: bzImage
>>> + Supported, ARM32: zImage
>>> + Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not
On 07/09/17 22:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Direct-boot kernel image format
+
+Supported, x86: bzImage
+Supported, ARM32: zImage
+Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is correct]
On ARM64 it's called Image.gz.
That's no
Hi,
Sorry I missed e-mail. It seems I was not CCed on it.
On 07/09/17 22:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
+### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough
+
+Status: Supported
I guess non-pci devices on ARM also use the IOMMU? (SMMU)
Yes, they do.
+### AR
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:07:08PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/11/2017 04:02 PM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 03:16:13PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> +### Netbac
On 09/11/2017 04:02 PM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 03:16:13PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Netback
+
+Status, Linux (netback): Supported
+Status, F
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 03:16:13PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> +### Netback
> >> +
> >> +Status, Linux (netback): Supported
> >> +Status, FreeBSD (netback): Supported
> >> +Status, QEM
On 09/07/2017 03:56 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:52:49PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 09/01/2017 04:00 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Direct-boot kernel image format
+
+Supported, x86: bzImage
>>>
On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
>> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
>> +
>> +Supported, x86: bzImage
>> +Supported, ARM32: zImage
>> +Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is correct]
>
> On ARM64 it's called I
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:54:11PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> > > +
> > > +Supported, x86: bzImage
> > > +Supported, ARM32: zImage
> > > +Support
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:54:11PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> > +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> > +
> > +Supported, x86: bzImage
> > +Supported, ARM32: zImage
> > +Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is correct]
>
>
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> +
> +Supported, x86: bzImage
> +Supported, ARM32: zImage
> +Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is correct]
On ARM64 it's called Image.gz.
> +Format which the toolstack accept for direct-bo
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 31.08.17 at 12:27, wrote:
> > vMCE: Is MCE an x86-only thing, or could this conceivably by extended
> > to ARM?
>
> I think this can't be reasonably extended beyond x86 (and,
> considering their similar origin, ia64).
Yes, Jan is right. ARM has SE
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > +### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough
> > +
> > +Status: Supported
>
> I guess non-pci devices on ARM also use the IOMMU? (SMMU)
Yes, they do.
> > +### ARM/SMMU
> > +
> > +Status: Supported, with caveats
> > +
> > +Only ARM SMMU hardware is
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:52:49PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/01/2017 04:00 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> >> +
> >> +Supported, x86: bzImage
> >
> > Do you mean booting a PV guest? If s
On 09/07/2017 02:57 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:49:00AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 08/31/2017 12:25 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
[snip]
+### x86/PVH dom0
>>> ^ v2
+
+
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:49:00AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/31/2017 12:25 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> +### x86/PV-on-HVM
> >
> > Do we really consider this a guest type? From both Xen and the
> > toolstack PoV this i
On 09/01/2017 04:00 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
>> +
>> +Supported, x86: bzImage
>
> Do you mean booting a PV guest? If so there are a few more formats.
>
>> +Supported, ARM32: zImage
>> +S
>>> On 07.09.17 at 13:31, wrote:
> On 08/31/2017 01:46 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 31.08.17 at 12:27, wrote:
>>> +### Live Patching
>>> +
>>> +Status: Supported, x86 only
>>> +
>>> +Compile time disabled
>>
>> Bu we're settled to change that, aren't we? It was even meant to be
>> so in 4
On 08/31/2017 01:46 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 31.08.17 at 12:27, wrote:
>> vMCE: Is MCE an x86-only thing, or could this conceivably by extended
>> to ARM?
>
> I think this can't be reasonably extended beyond x86 (and,
> considering their similar origin, ia64).
OK, I'll changet this to "x86
On 08/31/2017 12:25 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> Add a machine-readable file to describe what features are in what
>> state of being 'supported', as well as information about how long this
>> release will be supported, and so on.
>>
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> +
> +Supported, x86: bzImage
Do you mean booting a PV guest? If so there are a few more formats.
> +Supported, ARM32: zImage
> +Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is co
>>> On 31.08.17 at 12:27, wrote:
> vMCE: Is MCE an x86-only thing, or could this conceivably by extended
> to ARM?
I think this can't be reasonably extended beyond x86 (and,
considering their similar origin, ia64).
> +## Tooling
> +
> +### gdbsx
> +
> +Status, x86: Supported
> +
> +Debugger
>>> On 31.08.17 at 13:25, wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> +## Limits/Guest
>> +
>> +### Virtual CPUs
>> +
>> +Limit, x86 PV: 512
>> +Limit, x86 HVM: 128
>
> There has already been some discussion about the HVM vCPU limit due to
> other topics, is
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> Add a machine-readable file to describe what features are in what
> state of being 'supported', as well as information about how long this
> release will be supported, and so on.
>
> The document should be formatted using "semantic n
On 08/31/2017 12:03 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 31 August 2017 11:56
>> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
>> Cc: Ian Jackson ; Wei Liu ;
>> Andrew Cooper ; Jan Beulich
>> ; Tim (Xen.org) ; Da
> -Original Message-
> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 31 August 2017 11:56
> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Ian Jackson ; Wei Liu ;
> Andrew Cooper ; Jan Beulich
> ; Tim (Xen.org) ; Dario Faggioli
> ; Tamas K Lengyel ;
> Roger Pau Monn
On 08/31/2017 11:46 AM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> +
>> +### Blkfront
>> +
>> +Status, Linux: Supported
>> +Status, FreeBSD: Supported, Security support external
>> +Status, Windows: Supported [XXX]
>> +
>> +Guest-side driver capable of speaking the Xen PV bloc
> -Original Message-
> +
> +### Blkfront
> +
> +Status, Linux: Supported
> +Status, FreeBSD: Supported, Security support external
> +Status, Windows: Supported [XXX]
> +
> +Guest-side driver capable of speaking the Xen PV block protocol
> +
> +### Netfront
> +
> +Status, Lin
38 matches
Mail list logo
