Hi,
On 23 October 2017 at 21:31, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine.
>>
>> On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Instead of asserting the receive interrupt (
Hi Andre,
On 24 October 2017 at 16:57, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/10/17 12:00, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 23/10/2017 17:01, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
Hi Andre,
I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It
Hi,
On 24/10/17 12:00, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23/10/2017 17:01, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
>>> Hi Andre,
>>>
>>> I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine.
>>>
>>> On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara
>>> wr
Hi,
On 23/10/2017 17:01, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
Hi Andre,
I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine.
On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara wrote:
Instead of asserting the receive interrupt (RXI) on the first character
Hi,
On 18/10/17 17:32, Bhupinder Thakur wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine.
>
> On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Instead of asserting the receive interrupt (RXI) on the first character
>> in the FIFO, lets (ab)use the recei
Hi Andre,
I verified this patch on qualcomm platform. It is working fine.
On 18 October 2017 at 19:11, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Instead of asserting the receive interrupt (RXI) on the first character
> in the FIFO, lets (ab)use the receive timeout interrupt (RTI) for that
> purpose. That seems to
