>>> On 01.03.16 at 19:57, wrote:
> The inclusion rules conditions for errno.h were unnecesserily complicated, and
> required the includer to jump through hoops if they wished to avoid getting
> multiple namespaces worth of constants.
>
> Vastly simply the logic, and document what is going on.
Ni
On 3/1/16 12:57 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The inclusion rules conditions for errno.h were unnecesserily complicated, and
> required the includer to jump through hoops if they wished to avoid getting
> multiple namespaces worth of constants.
>
> Vastly simply the logic, and document what is going
