On 06/06/2016 09:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.06.16 at 15:09, wrote:
>> On 06/06/2016 04:47 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> It's identical to bar_init() now.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>>> ---
>>> I'm sorry for this 3/2 - I only now noticed that this additional
>>> simplification is no
>>> On 06.06.16 at 15:09, wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 04:47 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> It's identical to bar_init() now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>> ---
>> I'm sorry for this 3/2 - I only now noticed that this additional
>> simplification is now possible.
>
> I wonder whether we should also mo
On 06/06/2016 04:47 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> It's identical to bar_init() now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
> ---
> I'm sorry for this 3/2 - I only now noticed that this additional
> simplification is now possible.
I wonder whether we should also move content of read_dev_bar() into
bar_init().