On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 14:45 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 25/28] libxl: emuids: Perhaps change dm
> xs control path"):
> > On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 14:12 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > * In xenstore we record which qemus a domain has. This is
> > > necessary
> > >
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 25/28] libxl: emuids: Perhaps change dm xs
control path"):
> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 14:12 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * In xenstore we record which qemus a domain has. This is necessary
> > * for correct teardown. And, we also record whether the xenstore
> >
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 14:12 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 25/28] libxl: emuids: Perhaps change dm
> xs control path"):
> > So, do I understand correctly that the states (combinations of bits)
> > are:
>
> No.
>
> > Describing SPLIT as an "ID" is a bit odd (it's a ki
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 25/28] libxl: emuids: Perhaps change dm xs
control path"):
> So, do I understand correctly that the states (combinations of bits) are:
No.
> Describing SPLIT as an "ID" is a bit odd (it's a kind of meta thing) but I
> suppose I can see why it is done this way. An
