On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 19:00 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > One is to combine malloc + libxl__alloc_failed. The other is to avoid
> > dereferencing NULL pointer in case of malloc failure.
>
> The non-use of a gc for the latter in particular
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 19:00 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> One is to combine malloc + libxl__alloc_failed. The other is to avoid
> dereferencing NULL pointer in case of malloc failure.
The non-use of a gc for the latter in particular looks a bit suspicious
to me, but nonetheless this is an improvement:
