On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 14:17 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> In 415b58c1 (tools/libxc: Batch memory allocations for PV guests) the
> number of super pages is calculated with the number of total pages. That
> is wrong. It breaks PV guest vNUMA. The correct number of super pages
> should be derived from the n
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On 07/06/2015 02:30 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 02:26:37PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >>On 06/07/15 14:17, Wei Liu wrote:
> >>>In 415b58c1 (tools/libxc: Batch memory allocations for PV guests) the
> >>>number of
On 07/06/2015 02:30 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 02:26:37PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 06/07/15 14:17, Wei Liu wrote:
In 415b58c1 (tools/libxc: Batch memory allocations for PV guests) the
number of super pages is calculated with the number of total pages. That
is wrong. It bre
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 02:26:37PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/07/15 14:17, Wei Liu wrote:
> > In 415b58c1 (tools/libxc: Batch memory allocations for PV guests) the
> > number of super pages is calculated with the number of total pages. That
> > is wrong. It breaks PV guest vNUMA. The corre
On 06/07/15 14:17, Wei Liu wrote:
> In 415b58c1 (tools/libxc: Batch memory allocations for PV guests) the
> number of super pages is calculated with the number of total pages. That
> is wrong. It breaks PV guest vNUMA. The correct number of super pages
> should be derived from the number of pages w
On 07/06/2015 02:17 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
In 415b58c1 (tools/libxc: Batch memory allocations for PV guests) the
number of super pages is calculated with the number of total pages. That
is wrong. It breaks PV guest vNUMA. The correct number of super pages
should be derived from the number of pages wi
