On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:43:43AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.02.17 at 12:52, wrote:
> > And then remove hvm_vioapic (since it just contains a hvm_hw_ioapic struct
> > now). This is a preparatory change for introducing support for multiple vIO
> > APICs per domain.
>
> Having gone thro
>>> On 23.02.17 at 12:52, wrote:
> And then remove hvm_vioapic (since it just contains a hvm_hw_ioapic struct
> now). This is a preparatory change for introducing support for multiple vIO
> APICs per domain.
Having gone through the rest of this series, I think the replacing of
vioapic pointers by
>>> On 23.02.17 at 12:52, wrote:
> @@ -204,8 +205,7 @@ static void vioapic_write_indirect(
> break;
> }
>
> -vioapic_write_redirent(
> -vioapic, redir_index, vioapic->ioregsel&1, val);
> +vioapic_write_redirent(d, redir_index, vioapic->ioregsel&1
