On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 05:46 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 08.02.16 at 18:07, wrote:
> > There are only four users, and invbool_param() is an unnecessary
> > cognitive
> > overhead to use.
>
> While this isn't necessarily a bad change, I don't agree to either of
> these arguments. So I'm go
>>> On 08.02.16 at 18:07, wrote:
> There are only four users, and invbool_param() is an unnecessary cognitive
> overhead to use.
While this isn't necessarily a bad change, I don't agree to either of
these arguments. So I'm going to make my ack here dependent on
seeing some kind of positive feedba
