On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 14:47 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:19:54PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:06 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > To hopefully clarify what it meant.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > > ---
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:19:54PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:06 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > To hopefully clarify what it meant.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > ---
> > tools/libxc/xc_resume.c | 7 +--
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:52:06PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 1/3] libxc/xc_domain_resume: Update
> comment."):
> > On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 16:22 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > I'm not sure that `will return 1' is correct. IIRC there is some
> > > ... unpleasantne
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 1/3] libxc/xc_domain_resume: Update comment."):
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 16:22 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I'm not sure that `will return 1' is correct. IIRC there is some
> > ... unpleasantness here, with something effectively corrupting the
> > guest state in a
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 16:22 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 1/3] libxc/xc_domain_resume: Update
> comment."):
> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:06 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > To hopefully clarify what it meant.
> ...
> > > + * 1. (fast=1) Resume with special r
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 1/3] libxc/xc_domain_resume: Update comment."):
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:06 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > To hopefully clarify what it meant.
...
> > + * 1. (fast=1) Resume with special return code (1) that the guest
> > + * gets from SCHEDOP_shutdo
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:06 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> To hopefully clarify what it meant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> ---
> tools/libxc/xc_resume.c | 7 +--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_resume.c b/tools/libxc/xc