On 20/07/16 14:29, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 20/07/16 14:23, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> But I think you need to be more careful with your use of language.
>> `Disingenuous' implies dishonesty.
> The way I've heard it used implies a level of pretense, not necessarily
> dishonesty -- i.e., pretending that
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools: remove systemd
xenstore socket definitions"):
> However, calling what previously exists WRT xenstored stubdomains as
> "supported" is laughable. The lack of integration meant that anyone
> trying to
On 20/07/16 14:23, Ian Jackson wrote:
> But I think you need to be more careful with your use of language.
> `Disingenuous' implies dishonesty.
The way I've heard it used implies a level of pretense, not necessarily
dishonesty -- i.e., pretending that stubdom xenstored was a usable
option when it
On 20/07/16 14:32, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 20/07/16 13:08, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools: remove systemd
>> xenstore socket definitions"):
>>> On 20/07/16 12:12, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> To be clear:
On 20/07/16 14:11, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ross Lagerwall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools: remove systemd
> xenstore socket definitions"):
>> Nevertheless, I feel that this patch series makes the implementation
>> worse for users of xenstored as a daemon:
>
On 20/07/16 13:08, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools: remove systemd
> xenstore socket definitions"):
>> On 20/07/16 12:12, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> To be clear: I don't want to avoid systemd by any means. I just
On 20/07/16 14:08, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools: remove systemd
> xenstore socket definitions"):
>> On 20/07/16 12:12, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> To be clear: I don't want to avoid systemd by any means. I just
Ross Lagerwall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools: remove systemd
xenstore socket definitions"):
> Nevertheless, I feel that this patch series makes the implementation
> worse for users of xenstored as a daemon:
>
> - Because Type=oneshot is not intended to be use
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools: remove systemd
xenstore socket definitions"):
> On 20/07/16 12:12, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > To be clear: I don't want to avoid systemd by any means. I just don't
> > want to have a complex and ugly
On 20/07/16 13:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 20/07/16 12:12, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 20/07/16 12:52, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 20/07/16 11:02, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 02:44 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 29/06/1
On 20/07/16 12:12, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 20/07/16 12:52, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 20/07/16 11:02, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
On 06/29/2016 02:44 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 29/06/16 15:31, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>> On 06/29/
On 20/07/16 12:52, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 20/07/16 11:02, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>>> On 06/29/2016 02:44 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 29/06/16 15:31, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 02:00 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 2
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 20/07/16 11:02, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>> On 06/29/2016 02:44 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 29/06/16 15:31, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
On 06/29/2016 02:00 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 29/06/16 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 2
On 20/07/16 11:02, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 02:44 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 29/06/16 15:31, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>>> On 06/29/2016 02:00 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 29/06/16 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/06/16 13:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> @@ -2068,13 +1964,6
On 06/29/2016 02:44 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 29/06/16 15:31, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
On 06/29/2016 02:00 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 29/06/16 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 29/06/16 13:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
@@ -2068,13 +1964,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* Tell the kernel we
On 29/06/16 15:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 29/06/16 15:31, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>> On 06/29/2016 02:00 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 29/06/16 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 29/06/16 13:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
> @@ -2068,13 +1964,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> /* Tel
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:32:31PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/07/16 14:15, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 03:00:41PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> On 29/06/16 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >>> On 29/06/16 13:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
> @@ -2068,13 +1964,6 @@ int main(int
On 08/07/16 14:15, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 03:00:41PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 29/06/16 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 29/06/16 13:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
@@ -2068,13 +1964,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* Tell the kernel we're up and running. */
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 03:00:41PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 29/06/16 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 29/06/16 13:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> @@ -2068,13 +1964,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >>/* Tell the kernel we're up and running. */
> >>xenbus_notify_running();
> >>
On 29/06/16 15:31, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 02:00 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 29/06/16 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 29/06/16 13:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
@@ -2068,13 +1964,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* Tell the kernel we're up and running. */
On 06/29/2016 02:00 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 29/06/16 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 29/06/16 13:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
@@ -2068,13 +1964,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* Tell the kernel we're up and running. */
xenbus_notify_running();
-#if defined(XEN_SYSTEMD_ENA
On 29/06/16 14:52, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/06/16 13:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> @@ -2068,13 +1964,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> /* Tell the kernel we're up and running. */
>> xenbus_notify_running();
>>
>> -#if defined(XEN_SYSTEMD_ENABLED)
>> -if (systemd) {
>> -
On 29/06/16 13:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
> @@ -2068,13 +1964,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> /* Tell the kernel we're up and running. */
> xenbus_notify_running();
>
> -#if defined(XEN_SYSTEMD_ENABLED)
> - if (systemd) {
> - sd_notify(1, "READY=1");
> -
23 matches
Mail list logo
