Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] x86/MSI-X: XSA-120 follow-up

2015-03-16 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 13.03.15 at 21:16, wrote: > Given these extra config accesses, I am seriously wondering whether it > would be more efficient overall to trap&emulate dom0 completely and > allow Xen to cache things like the current control register state, > locations of capability structures, etc. I genuine

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] x86/MSI-X: XSA-120 follow-up

2015-03-13 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 10/03/15 16:16, Jan Beulich wrote: > The problem requiring the first patch here is actually what lead to > XSA-120. > > 1: be more careful during teardown > 2: access MSI-X table only after having enabled MSI-X > 3: reduce fiddling with control register during restore > 4: cleanup > > Signed-off