On 1/19/17 3:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.01.17 at 18:38, wrote:
>>
>> What's controversial about it?
>
> The not insignificant amount of assembly code it adds, when our
> overall goal is to reduce the amount of assembly code. But
> Andrew has meanwhile indicated he's okay for this to go
>>> On 18.01.17 at 18:38, wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.01.17 at 20:21, wrote:
>>> This is a series based on v11 of Daniel Kiper's
>>> "x86: multiboot2 protocol support" series. It aims to collect up all the
>>> fixes and changes that Andrew Cooper, Ja
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.01.17 at 20:21, wrote:
>> This is a series based on v11 of Daniel Kiper's
>> "x86: multiboot2 protocol support" series. It aims to collect up all the
>> fixes and changes that Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich and myself discovered in
>> co
>>> On 13.01.17 at 20:21, wrote:
> This is a series based on v11 of Daniel Kiper's
> "x86: multiboot2 protocol support" series. It aims to collect up all the
> fixes and changes that Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich and myself discovered in
> code review and testing on actual hardware. I've had problems
