>>> On 15.02.16 at 16:15, wrote:
> What about something like this instead? (Ported to be on top of this
> patch, since it's already been committed.)
>
> -George
>
> [PATCH] xen/p2m: Make dump table printing less clever
>
> Rather than detecting whether to print out the numerical value of the
On 12/02/16 14:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Coverity correctly identifies that the changes in mtrr_attrib_to_str()
> introduce dead code. strings[] is a 2d array, rather than an array of
> strings, which means that strings[x] will never be a NULL pointer.
>
> Adjust the check to compenstate, by loo
On 12/02/16 15:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.02.16 at 15:59, wrote:
>> Coverity correctly identifies that the changes in mtrr_attrib_to_str()
>> introduce dead code. strings[] is a 2d array, rather than an array of
>> strings, which means that strings[x] will never be a NULL pointer.
>>
>> Ad
>>> On 12.02.16 at 15:59, wrote:
> Coverity correctly identifies that the changes in mtrr_attrib_to_str()
> introduce dead code. strings[] is a 2d array, rather than an array of
> strings, which means that strings[x] will never be a NULL pointer.
>
> Adjust the check to compenstate, by looking f
