On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 22.04.16 at 12:08, wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 21.04.16 at 15:29, wrote:
> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> >> > @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static void __update_vcpu_system_time(struct vc
>>> On 22.04.16 at 12:08, wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 21.04.16 at 15:29, wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> > @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static void __update_vcpu_system_time(struct vcpu *v,
> int force)
>> > struct cpu_time
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 21.04.16 at 15:29, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> > @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static void __update_vcpu_system_time(struct vcpu *v,
> > int force)
> > struct cpu_time *t;
> > struct vcpu_time_info *u,
>>> On 21.04.16 at 15:29, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static void __update_vcpu_system_time(struct vcpu *v, int
> force)
> struct cpu_time *t;
> struct vcpu_time_info *u, _u = {};
> struct domain *d = v->domain;
> -