>>> On 15.02.16 at 14:39, wrote:
> On 15/02/16 12:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -4542,9 +4542,10 @@ x86_emulate(
>>
>> case 0xbc: /* bsf or tzcnt */ {
>> bool_t zf;
>> -asm ( "bsf %2,%0; setz %b1"
>> +
>> +asm ( "bsf %2,%0; setz %1"
>>: "=r" (dst.val)
On 15/02/16 12:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Let's give the compiler as much liberty in picking instruction operands
> as possible. Also drop unnecessary size modifiers when the correct size
> can already be derived from the asm() operands. Finally also drop an
> "unsigned" from idiv_dbl()'s second para
