Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mm: Drop is_guest_l3_slot() and simply callers

2017-08-28 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 03:50:59PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > With a 64bit hypervisor there are no conditional l3 slots, and this is > unlikely to change moving forwards. > > No functional change (as confirmed by diffing the disassembly. GCC obviously > already optimised this code away.) > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mm: Drop is_guest_l3_slot() and simply callers

2017-08-28 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 28.08.17 at 16:50, wrote: > With a 64bit hypervisor there are no conditional l3 slots, and this is > unlikely to change moving forwards. > > No functional change (as confirmed by diffing the disassembly. GCC obviously > already optimised this code away.) > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper