> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 12 December 2016 07:54
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hvm: don't create a default ioreq server...
>
> >>> On 09.12.16 at 18:55, wrote:
> > ..
>>> On 09.12.16 at 18:55, wrote:
> ...if the domain is not under construction.
I think the title will end up misleading this way. How about "x86/hvm:
don't unconditionally create a default ioreq server" with "Avoid doing
so if the domain is not under construction" as the 1st sentence?
As the pat
On 12/10/2016 02:21 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 09/12/16 17:55, Paul Durrant wrote:
...if the domain is not under construction.
If upstream QEMU is in use then it will explicitly create an ioreq server
rather than implicitly creating the default ioreq server, which is a
side-effect of reading
On 09/12/16 17:55, Paul Durrant wrote:
> ...if the domain is not under construction.
>
> If upstream QEMU is in use then it will explicitly create an ioreq server
> rather than implicitly creating the default ioreq server, which is a
> side-effect of reading HVM_PARAM_IOREQ_PFN, HVM_PARAM_BUFIOREQ_
