Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/SVM: don't deliver #GP without error code

2016-11-28 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 11/24/2016 09:13 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky (even though it's already been applied) ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/SVM: don't deliver #GP without error code

2016-11-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 24/11/16 14:33, Jan Beulich wrote: On 24.11.16 at 15:19, wrote: >> On 24/11/16 14:13, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich >> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper >> >> There is an opposite problem on the Intel side, delivering some #UD with >> an error code (although the guest behavi

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/SVM: don't deliver #GP without error code

2016-11-24 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:33:48AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 24.11.16 at 15:19, wrote: > > On 24/11/16 14:13, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper > > > > There is an opposite problem on the Intel side, delivering some #UD with > > an e

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/SVM: don't deliver #GP without error code

2016-11-24 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 24.11.16 at 15:19, wrote: > On 24/11/16 14:13, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper > > There is an opposite problem on the Intel side, delivering some #UD with > an error code (although the guest behaviour does appear to be correct, > so perha

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/SVM: don't deliver #GP without error code

2016-11-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 24/11/16 14:13, Jan Beulich wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper There is an opposite problem on the Intel side, delivering some #UD with an error code (although the guest behaviour does appear to be correct, so perhaps hardware swallows it). I will do a companion