Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] time: widen wallclock seconds to 64 bits

2015-02-02 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 02.02.15 at 15:40, wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:39 +, Jan Beulich wrote: >>[...] >> A note on the conditional suppressing the xen_wc_sec_hi helper macro >> definition in the ix86 case for hypervisor and tools: Neither of the >> two actually need this, and its presence causes the to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] time: widen wallclock seconds to 64 bits

2015-02-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:39 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > Linux is in the process of converting their seconds representation to > 64 bits, so in order to support it consistently we should follow suit > (which at some point in quite a few years we'd have to do anyway). To > represent this in struct sh

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] time: widen wallclock seconds to 64 bits

2015-01-30 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 29/01/15 15:39, Jan Beulich wrote: > Linux is in the process of converting their seconds representation to > 64 bits, so in order to support it consistently we should follow suit > (which at some point in quite a few years we'd have to do anyway). To > represent this in struct shared_info we lev

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] time: widen wallclock seconds to 64 bits

2015-01-29 Thread Daniel De Graaf
On 01/29/2015 10:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: Linux is in the process of converting their seconds representation to 64 bits, so in order to support it consistently we should follow suit (which at some point in quite a few years we'd have to do anyway). To represent this in struct shared_info we leve

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] time: widen wallclock seconds to 64 bits

2015-01-29 Thread Tim Deegan
At 15:39 + on 29 Jan (1422542343), Jan Beulich wrote: > Linux is in the process of converting their seconds representation to > 64 bits, so in order to support it consistently we should follow suit > (which at some point in quite a few years we'd have to do anyway). To > represent this in struc