: [Xen-devel] [BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of
> sectors, unable to boot
>
> >>> On 10.11.17 at 10:40, wrote:
> >> Anthony PERARD
> >> Sent: 09 November 2017 17:50
> >> The problem is that QEMU 4.10 have a lock on the disk image. When
>
>>> On 10.11.17 at 10:40, wrote:
>> Anthony PERARD
>> Sent: 09 November 2017 17:50
>> The problem is that QEMU 4.10 have a lock on the disk image. When
>> booting an HVM guest with a qdisk backend, the disk is open twice, but
>> can only be locked once, so when the pv disk is been initialized, the
utek Wilk
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of
> sectors, unable to boot
>
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 05:03:18PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:15:52AM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Roger Pau Monné
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:15:52AM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please try to avoid top-posting.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Reardon wro
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 05:03:18PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:15:52AM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please try to avoid top-posting.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Rea
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:15:52AM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné
> wrote:
>
> > Please try to avoid top-posting.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > > So am I correct in reading this that for at least the foresee
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné
wrote:
> Please try to avoid top-posting.
>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > So am I correct in reading this that for at least the foreseeable future
> > storage using 4k sector sizes is not gonna happen? I'm just
[BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of
> sectors, unable to boot
>
> Please try to avoid top-posting.
>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > So am I correct in reading this that for at least the foreseeable future
> > storage using 4k se
Please try to avoid top-posting.
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> So am I correct in reading this that for at least the foreseeable future
> storage using 4k sector sizes is not gonna happen? I'm just trying to
> figure out if I need to get some different hardware.
So am I correct in reading this that for at least the foreseeable future
storage using 4k sector sizes is not gonna happen? I'm just trying to
figure out if I need to get some different hardware.
Thank you!
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Roger Pau Monné
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:31:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:31:06AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.11.17 at 11:30, wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote:
> >> > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
> >> > size disks.
>>> On 07.11.17 at 11:30, wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote:
>> > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
>> > size disks. The LVM volumes on that array seem to work fine when mounted
>> > by t
[BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of
> sectors, unable to boot
>
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote:
> > > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
> > >
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote:
> > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
> > size disks. The LVM volumes on that array seem to work fine when mounted
> > by the host, and when passed through to any
>>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote:
> I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
> size disks. The LVM volumes on that array seem to work fine when mounted
> by the host, and when passed through to any of the Linux guests, but
> Windows guests aren't able to use them whe
15 matches
Mail list logo
