On 19.02.2015 12:20, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Is it perhaps
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=f1e0df14412ccc6933a68eda66ac5b7d89186b62
There are a number of correctness fixes in that range which will
adversely affect performance.
I now reverted:
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitwe
On 19/02/15 14:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.15 at 14:08, wrote:
>> On 19/02/15 11:08, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
>>> Hello Xen developers,
>>>
>>> since we use Xen for our production systems, I run many tests on Xen
>>> (stability/performance). One test now uncovered a serious performance
>>>
>>> On 19.02.15 at 14:08, wrote:
> On 19/02/15 11:08, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
>> Hello Xen developers,
>>
>> since we use Xen for our production systems, I run many tests on Xen
>> (stability/performance). One test now uncovered a serious performance
>> regression when updating from Xen 4.2.3 to 4
On 19/02/15 11:08, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
> Hello Xen developers,
>
> since we use Xen for our production systems, I run many tests on Xen
> (stability/performance). One test now uncovered a serious performance
> regression when updating from Xen 4.2.3 to 4.2.x (with x>=4). To
> reproduce run a do
On 19/02/15 11:08, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
> Hello Xen developers,
>
> since we use Xen for our production systems, I run many tests on Xen
> (stability/performance). One test now uncovered a serious performance
> regression when updating from Xen 4.2.3 to 4.2.x (with x>=4). To
> reproduce run a dom
Hello Xen developers,
since we use Xen for our production systems, I run many tests on Xen
(stability/performance). One test now uncovered a serious performance
regression when updating from Xen 4.2.3 to 4.2.x (with x>=4). To
reproduce run a domU (HVM) and compile a kernel for example ("time m
