Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the block tree

2016-07-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Boris, On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:25:00 -0400 Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > > Jeremy Fitzhardinge > > Jeremy is no longer involved with Xen. However, > > Juergen Gross > > is also Linux Xen/x86 maintainer. I have replaced Jeremy with Juergen. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell __

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the block tree

2016-07-25 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 07/25/2016 06:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Stefano Stabellini > wrote: >> The To and CC list for these emails is a bit outdated. I want to make >> sure they reach the right people. Could you please add: >> >> boris.ostrov...@oracle.c

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the block tree

2016-07-25 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Stefano Stabellini > wrote: > > > > The To and CC list for these emails is a bit outdated. I want to make > > sure they reach the right people. Could you please add: > > > > boris.ostrov...@o

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the block tree

2016-07-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Stefano, On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > The To and CC list for these emails is a bit outdated. I want to make > sure they reach the right people. Could you please add: > > boris.ostrov...@oracle.com > david.vra...@citrix.com OK, I have added them as c

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the block tree

2016-07-25 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > > between commit: > > a418090aa88b ("block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support") > > from the block tree and commit: >

[Xen-devel] linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the block tree

2016-07-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in: drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c between commit: a418090aa88b ("block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support") from the block tree and commit: ff595325ed55 ("xen-blkfront: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gat